CTBTO 2026Evidence & methods

Environmental inputs

HCTBTO 2026Broader workflow

Sediment inputs actually used

Three databases supplied the bottoms for four station areas

This report starts from accepted computation receipts. It leaves out sediment sources that the software could query but that supplied no retained input to these runs.

3retained databases
4station areas
687computed paths
7,860bottom queries

Geographic overview

Where each source entered the model

Click a station marker to open its case. A violet ring means EarthByte refined a compatible Diesing class.

Four station areas and the sediment databases usedA world map locating HA01, HA03, HA08 and HA10. Marker colors show the database or databases retained for accepted bottom inputs.HA01HA03HA08HA102,000 km
Geoscience Australia / MARSDiesing deep-sea sedimentsEarthByte Seabed Lithology v1

Four bounded cases

One station area at a time

The counts below share one source-map cohort and therefore add cleanly. They should not be mixed with later execution cohorts.

HA01 · Southwest Australia

One database: Geoscience Australia / MARS.

The Australian parameter grids supplied mud, sand and gravel fractions at every accepted query. The fractions were normalized and mixed into one bottom tuple at each position.

Geoscience Australia / MARS
Computed paths
678
Bottom queries
5,717
Recorded classes
3,101 sand2,584 muddy sand27 sandy mud5 mud

Union across the four areas

What the three databases contribute

These products describe sediment. None directly measures the complete acoustic bottom tuple at the modeled coordinates.

Geoscience Australia / MARS

Australian sedimentary parameters

Geoscience Australia interpolated MARS seabed samples onto 0.01° grids of mud, sand, gravel and bulk carbonate across Australia’s marine jurisdiction. We use the three texture fractions; carbonate remains a separate attribute.

Quality reading. Grid spacing is not observation density. The underlying archive is sparse offshore, and the published product has no per-cell uncertainty layer.

Diesing deep-sea sediments

Deep-sea sediments of the global ocean

A 10 × 10 km equal-area prediction for ocean deeper than 500 m. It provides a dominant class, five class-probability surfaces and maximum probability. The classifier was trained on 10,438 records after filtering and duplicate reduction.

Quality reading. Spatial cross-validation reported 59.4% overall accuracy. Calcareous sediment and clay were strongest; rarer classes were much less reliable.

EarthByte Seabed Lithology v1

Seabed Lithology v1

EarthByte’s 0.1° global dominant-lithology grid distinguishes 13 classes. It was trained from 14,399 quality-controlled surface or near-surface samples selected from more than 200,000 archive records.

Quality reading. Reported accuracy reaches 80% for major lithologies, not for every class or cell. The distributed dominant-class grid has no cell-level confidence field.

From geology to RAM

A declared engineering conversion, not a local measurement

OceanAcoustics 0.1.25 freezes one coherent value set. RAM consumes attenuation in decibels per compressional wavelength.

Mixtures at HA01

Normalize the mapped texture fractions so their sum is one. Density and attenuation are ordinary weighted averages. Sound speed is averaged through slowness—the time taken per unit distance.

Densityρ = Σ fᵢ ρᵢ
Sound speedc = 1 / Σ(fᵢ / cᵢ)
Attenuationαλ = Σ fᵢ αλ,i

For comparison in dB per metre: αm = αλ f / c. That conversion is explanatory; RAM receives αλ.

Frozen material tuples

Materialc
m/s
ρ
g/cm³
αλ
dB/λ
Gravel1,8002.000.60
Sand1,6501.900.80
Silt1,5751.701.00
Clay1,5001.500.20
Mud1,4951.470.7151

Gravel through clay use the indicative engineering values in Jensen et al., Computational Ocean Acoustics, Table 1.3. Broad calcareous and radiolarian fine cover maps to silt; unresolved HA03 material maps to the labelled sand fallback.

The mud exception

A bounded low-frequency bridge

Mud sound speed and density use the silty-clay means from Orsi and Dunn. Its attenuation preserves a 63 Hz mud-to-sand ratio on Jensen’s sand scale:

αλ,mud = 0.8 × (0.0598 / 0.0669) = 0.7151 dB/λ

The sand reference follows Zhou, Zhang and Knobles. This is a transparent project bridge, not a universal empirical law for mud.

Interpretation boundary

The maps constrain a model choice; they do not validate the seabed

  • Mapped class is not a core sample at the path coordinate.
  • A finer EarthByte label is accepted only when it stays inside the Diesing sediment family.
  • NCEI supplied no accepted input here, so it is absent from this report.
  • The acoustic tuple is a reproducible prior. Sensitivity tests, not decorative precision, carry the uncertainty forward.